Philosophers Debate: Navigating the Intersection of AI and Education

This image features a conceptual debate with eight philosophers, engaged in an intense discussion around a round wooden table in a sophisticated library setting. Each philosopher displays distinct styles, reflecting a blend of traditional and modern attire appropriate to their philosophical eras. The room is adorned with bookshelves, globes, and ancient scrolls, symbolizing a mix of historical and contemporary thought. The philosophers are actively conversing and gesturing, highlighting their engagement in the intellectual exchange. The atmosphere is charged with a pursuit of knowledge and understanding, set under a domed ceiling that casts a warm, inviting light over the scene.

Welcome to an experiment using my new “Peter’s Visionary Debaters” Custom GPT, available at

Inspired by a recent social media discussion on the merits and pitfalls of AI in education, I decided to bring together a diverse panel of historical and contemporary thinkers (borrowed from this video).

In this session, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Steve Jobs, Marie Curie, and Gandhi each present their views, grounded in their unique philosophies and historical contexts. They explore various dimensions of AI’s impact on education—Socrates interrogates the ethical aspects, Plato examines the ideological implications, Aristotle analyzes the logical consequences, Steve Jobs argues for the innovative potential, Marie Curie emphasizes scientific integrity, and Gandhi focuses on humanitarian impacts.

Let the debate begin…

Socrates: “Let us examine whether the introduction of artificial intelligence in education serves the true purpose of learning. Does it merely impart knowledge, or does it also teach the discernment needed to use that knowledge wisely? Can a machine instill virtue in students, or does it risk creating a facade of understanding without true wisdom?”

Plato: “AI in education could be likened to the tools in the Allegory of the Cave—it may either be a source of illusion or a means to greater enlightenment. The critical factor is the ideational framework behind its use. If AI helps us to access the ideal forms of knowledge and truth, then its role is justifiable. However, it must not detract from the philosopher’s path to deeper understanding through dialectic methods.”

Aristotle: “The utility of AI in education must be assessed through its outcomes. Does it enhance the ability to think logically, to analyze, and to understand the causes of things? If AI can be developed to complement these goals, supporting empirical learning and syllogistic reasoning, then it can be a valuable tool. However, we must ensure that it does not replace the essential human components of learning—the experiences that foster practical wisdom and ethical considerations.”

Steve Jobs: “AI presents an opportunity to radically innovate how educational content is delivered and personalized. It has the potential to transform traditional education systems, making learning more accessible, engaging, and tailored to individual needs. The challenge and opportunity lie in designing AI tools that truly enhance the educational experience and inspire creativity, rather than simply automating teaching.”

Marie Curie: “From a scientific standpoint, the integrity of AI in education hinges on empirical evidence of its effectiveness and its ability to foster a deep understanding of scientific principles. The deployment of AI should be driven by rigorous testing and validation, ensuring that it truly aids the scientific inquiry process and prepares students to contribute to the field of science.”

Gandhi: “The incorporation of AI in education must be evaluated for its impact on humanity and social equity. We must ask whether it promotes inclusivity and moral development, or if it widens the gap between different societal groups. The true measure of its value will be whether it serves the poorest and helps bridge the gap between the haves and the have-nots.”

Socrates: “Indeed, if AI is to be employed in education, we must not overlook its ethical implications. Does AI enhance or diminish the teacher’s role in cultivating moral virtues among students? Can we entrust a machine with the task of not only delivering information but also shaping character?”

Plato: “Socrates raises an essential point. My concern is that reliance on AI might lead students to become passive recipients of knowledge rather than active participants in their own intellectual development. It is vital that AI supports the dialectic process, not replaces it. How can we ensure that AI tools foster genuine understanding and not merely the illusion of knowledge?”

Aristotle: “Both of you speak wisely. The effectiveness of AI should be measured by its ability to supplement the natural learning process. It should aid in deducing principles from specific cases and synthesizing new ideas from established knowledge. However, if AI begins to substitute for these critical thinking skills, it could hinder rather than help educational growth.”

Steve Jobs: “I see AI as a disruptive innovation with the potential to challenge and change the educational status quo. It’s not just about automation but augmentation—enhancing the learning experience. It can free teachers from mundane tasks and give them more time to address individual students’ needs and foster creativity. The key lies in how we implement and integrate AI into the curriculum.”

Marie Curie: “From a scientific perspective, AI can significantly advance how we teach complex subjects. By using data-driven methods, we can better understand student learning patterns and adapt teaching methods accordingly. However, this must be done with caution to maintain scientific rigor and integrity. It is crucial that AI tools in education are developed by interdisciplinary teams that include educators, ethicists, and scientists.”

Gandhi: “While the potential benefits of AI in education are clear, we must also consider its accessibility. An ethical deployment of AI requires that it be accessible to all layers of society, including the most marginalized. If AI exacerbates educational inequalities, then its use would be contrary to the principles of justice and fairness. It must empower, not alienate.”

Socrates: “This brings us back to a fundamental question: what is the goal of education? If it is merely to transmit knowledge, then perhaps AI has a place. But if it is to develop wise and virtuous citizens, we must ensure that AI serves this end and does not detract from it.”

Plato: “Indeed, the ultimate test of AI in education will be its ability to help us ascend from the shadows of ignorance into the light of knowledge and reason. If AI can contribute to this ascent, then its integration into education will be both beneficial and necessary.”

Aristotle: “It seems, then, that our consensus leans towards cautious optimism. AI has potential, but it must be wielded prudently, with constant evaluation to ensure it fulfills its role as a tool for educational enhancement, not as a crutch that diminishes our intellectual capacities.”

Steve Jobs: “I agree, Aristotle. It’s about thinking differently—using AI not just for what it can do, but what it should do in education. Innovation here means creating something that genuinely makes a difference, not just something that is technically impressive.”

Marie Curie: “Precisely, Steve. The scientific community must be integral in developing AI for education, ensuring that its application is both scientifically valid and ethically sound.”

Gandhi: “And let us not forget the human element—the teachers, the students, and the broader community. AI should be a tool for enhancing human connection, not replacing it. It should contribute to a more equitable society by making high-quality education universally accessible.”

The debate has highlighted diverse yet converging viewpoints on the role of AI in education, stressing the need for ethical consideration, educational efficacy, scientific integrity, innovative application, and social equity. This discussion reflects a comprehensive analysis that balances enthusiasm for technological possibilities with caution for maintaining human values.

In closing, what are your thoughts on this debate about AI in education? Did the views expressed align well with each participant’s historical or philosophical background? Does the conclusion resonate with your own perspectives on AI in education? Additionally, are there other philosophers or thinkers you would like to see included who might offer a different approach?

Considering the capabilities of this ‘Peter’s Visionary Debaters’ Custom GPT, what other topics would you be interested in exploring through similar discussions with these unique philosophers?

New Custom GPT: Find Keywords – A Powerful Tool for Content Analysis

New Custom GPT: Find Keywords

I’ve created a new Custom GPT that will reduce text to just the keywords. The GPT is named Find Keywords and can be found at

Note that it requires a subscription to ChatGPT Plus. Unfortunately, OpenAI does not offer trial subscriptions, and subscriptions cost $20 USD per month. Personally, I find the subscription well worth it for both personal programming projects and for personal productivity.

Continue reading “New Custom GPT: Find Keywords – A Powerful Tool for Content Analysis”

Google Gemini vs ChatGPT: Generating Alt-Text. Who Wins?

An illustrative comparison between Google Gemini and ChatGPT for generating alt-text, depicted through a split design. On the left, Google Gemini is symbolized by futuristic, abstract shapes in blues and greens, embodying innovation and digital intelligence. On the right, ChatGPT is represented through a network of interconnected nodes and lines in warm orange and red tones, highlighting advanced AI technology and communication. A bold 'VS' symbol in the center accentuates the competitive analysis between the two technologies, against a backdrop that merges both designs, suggesting a blend of competition and collaboration in the field of alt-text generation.


I’m currently subscribing to ChatGPT and Google Gemini to test them both out. One of the tasks I often use chatbots for is creating alt-text for my images.

For the importance of using alt-text in your images, see this post.

The prompt given to Gemini and ChatGPT was: ‘Alt text for this image‘.

Here is the image I used. Note that it includes text instructions and images.

Continue reading “Google Gemini vs ChatGPT: Generating Alt-Text. Who Wins?”

The Importance of Alt-Text in Enhancing Digital Accessibility and Engagement

An engaging feature image showcasing a computer screen displaying alt-text symbols, surrounded by diverse users engaging with digital content. The scene highlights inclusivity and accessibility in the digital realm, with a modern and professional style suitable for a blog post on the importance of alt-text for images.

This blog post, created by ChatGPT, supports another post of mine where I test ChatGPT and Google Gemini to see which is better at generating alt-text.

In the digital age, images are ubiquitous, serving as a powerful tool for storytelling, marketing, and communication across various online platforms. However, the visual nature of images can inadvertently exclude a significant portion of the audience, particularly individuals with visual impairments who rely on screen readers to navigate the internet. This is where alternative text, commonly known as alt-text, becomes a critical element in creating inclusive and accessible digital content. This blog post delves into the importance of using alt-text when posting images in blog posts or on social media, highlighting its impact on accessibility, search engine optimization (SEO), and user engagement.

Continue reading “The Importance of Alt-Text in Enhancing Digital Accessibility and Engagement”

Using AI Chatbots to Solve my Pixel 7 Pro Charging Problem

A Pixel 7 Pro smartphone is displayed on a wireless charging pad, not charging, indicated by a visible red cross or question mark on the screen. In the background, various AI chatbot icons are depicted in speech bubbles, each providing different pieces of advice or troubleshooting steps. The setting is tech-focused, with a lighthearted yet informative tone, highlighting the diversity of AI assistance in solving technical issues.

My Pixel 7 Pro phone decided to stop charging wirelessly. I think I’ve exhausted any logical troubleshooting ideas I have so decided to turn the problem over to some AI chatbots before I bring the phone back to Telus while it’s still under warranty.

Following is a comparison of the different AI chatbots I used. As part of my troubleshooting prompt, it was important that the solution cite any sources that is uses. My prompt was….

Continue reading “Using AI Chatbots to Solve my Pixel 7 Pro Charging Problem”

Using Python To Quickly Open Multiple Websites In Your Browser

Generated with AI ∙ January 18, 2024 at 1:10 p.m.

I had a problem where I was opening about a dozen bookmarks at the same time in Brave, and in doing so, it was giving me a “503 Service Temporarily Unavailable” error.

To fix this, I turned to Copilot Pro with this prompt:

Write a Python program that opens in my web browser (using Django?) that has a list of URLs that it opens in new tabs with a pause of 0.5 seconds between them. For the initial URLs, use Google and Microsoft.

Continue reading “Using Python To Quickly Open Multiple Websites In Your Browser”

Ten Things I Learned – December 5, 2023 Update

April Wine

I was sad to hear of Myles Goodwyn‘s death. Myles was the lead singer of April Wine, a Canadian band that had quite an influence on my musical tastes.


Want to your open WordPress links in a new tab as the default? “External Links in New Window / New Tab” is your solution.

Speed Test

Google has a speed test webpage. (I’ve added it to my Google A-Z page.)

Continue reading “Ten Things I Learned – December 5, 2023 Update”